The Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission discarded yet another senseless campaign finance law. The ruling should strengthen ...
Back in 2013 I argued that under the Supreme Court's jurisprudence algorithmic editing is speech for First Amendment purposes, and in Moody v. NetChoice the Supreme Court squarely so stated, in the ...
Type to search articles, cases, and authors. Press ↵ to view all results. The Roberts court is often treated as especially protective of the First Amendment. It is true that the court has reshaped ...
Some legal principles are so basic that a question based on them “all but answers itself.” That was exactly what the Supreme Court said last month when it allowed a pro-life resource center to ...
Arizona’s Anti-SLAPP law is, plain and simple, an attempt to protect First Amendment interests by demanding greater proof of non-vindictive intent by those seeking to punish acts that involve ...
What first needs to be accepted about conservatives’ decades-long struggle to ensure the Ten Commandments could be posted in public school classrooms is that this is not a debate about what they are ...
A federal court narrowly ruled Florida's Stop WOKE Act violates First Amendment rights for students and professors.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Wednesday sided with a faith-based pregnancy center that raised First Amendment concerns about an investigation into whether it misled people to discourage ...
Why do the U.S. Department of Defense and Secretary Pete Hegseth want to violate the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment regarding the freedom of the press? It seems that they don't want the people to ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results